543, applies to searches of vehicles that are supported by probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband. (a) The "automobile exception" to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement established in Carroll v. Held: Police officers who have legitimately stopped an automobile and who have probable cause to believe that contraband is concealed somewhere within it may conduct a warrantless search of the vehicle that is as thorough as a magistrate could authorize by warrant. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that while the officers had probable cause to stop and search respondent's car-including its trunk without a warrant, they should not have opened either the paper bag or the leather pouch found in the trunk without first obtaining a warrant. Respondent was subsequently convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute-the heroin and currency found in the searches having been introduced in evidence after respondent's pretrial motion to suppress the evidence had been denied. The officer then drove the car to headquarters, where another warrantless search of the trunk revealed a zippered leather pouch containing cash. One of the officers opened the car's trunk, found a closed brown paper bag, and after opening the bag, discovered glassine bags containing white powder (later determined to be heroin). ![]() ![]() Acting on information from an informant that a described individual was selling narcotics kept in the trunk of a certain car parked at a specified location, District of Columbia police officers immediately drove to the location, found the car there, and a short while later stopped the car and arrested the driver (respondent), who matched the informant's description.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |